... we remember

The Central Ohio Linux User Group

Ohio's Oldest Linux User Group

  This site is powered by:  
[Apache]
Home Page Mailing List Meetings Links Topics Source Code Presentations Knowledge User Groups Adminstrivia Click for Columbus, Ohio Forecast
NWS Port Columbus

 Mailing List  [ Up ] 
On this page:  Main list   |    New Archives   |    Lunch   |    Jobs   |    Munging   |    Admin

     The Central Ohio Linux Users Group has a history of a mixed   majordomo and   Mailman run mailing list.  Topics center (not too surprisingly) on Linux system setup, maintenance, and anecdotes. These days, (2009) Mailman had eclipsed the older ways. It is a moderate volume list -- maybe 5-25 pieces a day.   It does, however, have a nice, high content to 'noise' ratio, and is aggressively UCE filtered ... A digest of each list is available. A few notes regarding all lists:

Colug

Mailman uses a web interface for all management of subscriptions.
Click here to manage your new or existing subscription.
    [GNU Mailman]

A subject line header of [colug] is automatically added to each post. (procmail maven will no doubt re-write headers to their own taste.) This should help users using mail sorting software. If your post does not immediately show, it probably was directed by the program to an editor, for possible 'repost.'

I'm hungry ...

     There also exists a 'colug-lunch' list, with a broader charter ['I'm hungry in body and soul -- Where do the geeks eat?'].
here

I'm looking for a better job ...

     There also exists a 'colug-jobs' list, with a broader charter ['I heard about an opening that was interesting']. Please limit recruiter posts to this venue, please.
here

Reply-To Munge

     We formerly (until a server relocation 1 Sept 2009) 'munged' the Reply-To header, as a
conscious decision. See, e.g., the Majordomo FAQ at section 3.4. See also: this. The appears to be sanctioned at section 4.4.3 of RFC 822.

     For a contrary opinion, see here. This topic is probably a vi vs. emacs, or a TUI vs. GUI debate -- not capable of one 'correct' answer. If you find this problem, consult man procmail, and you can mangle inbound mail as preferred and to taste. Failing that, see this link for a compilation of mail and news management tools. See also, demime.

     And then speaking of contrary opinions, there is DJB's (and not DJB ex Red Hat) check-in on the topic here, implicitly ignored in RFC 2369.

     There are several expired draft RFC and related Reply-To proposals: DRUMS, Mailing List Behavior (Tip o' the hat to the RPM-List)

     As noted, we also 'brand' the subject line of the list, but see: RFC 2919 -- Except for the history of the group, its orientation to help new users, and the fact that it greatly pre-dates this RFC, we would probably not ... .


  Copyright © 2000 The Central Ohio Linux User Group. Hunh?
All rights reserved.
Search