[COLUG] Fedora on production servers

[Travis Sidelinger]

I second that sediment for Fedora on servers.  Fedora is about the 
latest and greatest technology fast.  Unless there is a new feature you 
just gotta have, a more stable OS like CentOS is far better suited for 
the job.  If you still want to use Fedora on a server I'd say go with 
FC4, as the number of updates coming down the pipe are fewer.

Aaron Howard wrote:
> On 8/18/06, Dane Miller <dane at olneyfriends.org> wrote:
>>
>> So has Fedora changed since it's inception?  Who uses Fedora in
>> production?  For what task?  Why?
>>
>> Anyone care to share their experience on Fedora buginess?  On Fedora
>> advantages?
>>
>
> I presently support/admin/develop for a few different companies' Linux
> systems.  Fedora Core 3 is installed on my laptop only because I
> haven't taken the time to move to Ubuntu.  I use Ubuntu on my desktop
> at home and I'm sold.
>
> Production servers range from RH6.2 (if it ain't broke), to CentOS
> 4.2.  I'm sure Fedora could run a server fine; but, it just seems
> CentOS (as well as many other distros) are better suited to the task.
> I also feel the Fedora release cycle is too rapid and the support
> window too short for servers...but YMMV.
> _______________________________________________
> colug432 mailing list colug432 at colug.net
> http://www.colug.net/mailman/listinfo/colug432
>