[COLUG] Load Balancers

Joe Whipple joe at whipple.cc
Tue Mar 20 16:54:16 EST 2007


We personally use the Coyote E350si's, I love them and recommend them 
personally.
My previous employer is where I got my first exposure to them, I liked 
them so much I installed them in my present server room...
The only downside is if you want to do SSL, you will definitely have to 
buy an SSL card for each Coyote box ($2600ish each), and load balancing 
between 2 different geo locations requires Envoy, which is some more on 
top so they can get pricey, but they are the best I have used out there 
and waaay easy to manage and set up.

ferguson wrote:
> My company is looking at buying a load balancer to put between two engines (Endeca is the app running on HP DL360s) and our AS/400.  We don't need a ton of horsepower to do the load balancing (IE - Cisco CSS, F5, Foundry, etc).  Our main VAR is CDW.  They are pitching a Coyote Point E350si.  They also sell Baracudda boxes.  Any pros / cons for each device?  I've worked with the F5 & Cisco in the past.  I've heard of Coyote Point (in Linux Journal).  Never really heard of the Baracudda before.  Anyone worked with the Coytote Point or Baracudda?  Have a preference?
>
> Thanks,
> Steve
> _______________________________________________
> colug432 mailing list colug432 at colug.net
> http://www.colug.net/mailman/listinfo/colug432
>
>   

-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by Brokenmail.com, and is
believed to be clean.



More information about the colug432 mailing list