[COLUG] Load Balancers
Joe Whipple
joe at whipple.cc
Tue Mar 20 16:54:16 EST 2007
We personally use the Coyote E350si's, I love them and recommend them
personally.
My previous employer is where I got my first exposure to them, I liked
them so much I installed them in my present server room...
The only downside is if you want to do SSL, you will definitely have to
buy an SSL card for each Coyote box ($2600ish each), and load balancing
between 2 different geo locations requires Envoy, which is some more on
top so they can get pricey, but they are the best I have used out there
and waaay easy to manage and set up.
ferguson wrote:
> My company is looking at buying a load balancer to put between two engines (Endeca is the app running on HP DL360s) and our AS/400. We don't need a ton of horsepower to do the load balancing (IE - Cisco CSS, F5, Foundry, etc). Our main VAR is CDW. They are pitching a Coyote Point E350si. They also sell Baracudda boxes. Any pros / cons for each device? I've worked with the F5 & Cisco in the past. I've heard of Coyote Point (in Linux Journal). Never really heard of the Baracudda before. Anyone worked with the Coytote Point or Baracudda? Have a preference?
>
> Thanks,
> Steve
> _______________________________________________
> colug432 mailing list colug432 at colug.net
> http://www.colug.net/mailman/listinfo/colug432
>
>
--
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by Brokenmail.com, and is
believed to be clean.
More information about the colug432
mailing list