[COLUG] OpenXML
Dave Maxwell
dmaxwell at columbus.rr.com
Tue Apr 8 17:56:19 EDT 2008
On Tue April 8 2008, Mark Erbaugh wrote:
> I just received an email from Microsoft that Office OpenXML (ISO/IEC DIS
> 29500) will be approved as an international standard. Is this a good
> thing for Linux?
>
> _______________________________________________
> colug432 mailing list colug432 at colug.net
> http://www.colug.net/mailman/listinfo/colug432
I won't recount the whole story but MS severely gamed the process and pretty
much used every dirty trick to get this sorry excuse for a standard approved.
lwn.net is as good a place as any to start getting the backstory on that.
In a word, no this is not good for Linux. A number of governments and
corporations finally got wise to the fact that archiving data in a format
that MS controls is less than wise so significant numbers of large
organizations were beginning to standardize on ODF. MS essentially dumped
the binary structure of Office documents to XML and most infamously added
things like RenderLikeWord95 to the standard without actually filling in how
one decodes such legacy cruft. Incomplete as it is, the OOXML spec runs to
over 6,000 pages and doesn't appear to be clear enough to actually implement
even if it wasn't gargantuan. Furthermore, no version of Office actually
implements it as written and MS has stated they won't be bound by their own
standard. Lastly, parts of the OOXML are patent encumbered. The "pledge"
from MS not to sue over them is in no way binding.
Basically, MS Marketing needed to ability to say "See! We have an open
standard too! There's no need to consider competing products...."
Dave
--
If Love Were Oil, I'd Be About A Quart Low
-- Book title by Lewis Grizzard
More information about the colug432
mailing list