[COLUG] Centos version questions, and a few others..
Tom Hanlon
tom at functionalmedia.com
Sun Jan 20 21:47:09 EST 2008
On 20 Jan 2008, at 20:54, Duane wrote:
> Tom Hanlon wrote:
>
>> I assume that (gcc version 3.4.6 20060404 (Red Hat 3.4.6-9))
>> implies that I am running the CentOS version that is equivalent to
>> RHEL3.4 .
>> Is that assumption correct ?
>
> That's not the CentOS version, that's the version of gcc that compiled
> the kernel.
Well then, how do I get the CentOS version that I am running ? I
thought Redhat had a /etc/redhat-release file. i will look for that.
[web at main ~]$ cat /etc/redhat-release
CentOS release 4.6 (Final)
>
>> I will be installing and exploring memcached, does anyone have any
>> experiences that they would like to share ?
>
> What do you want to know about it, and more to the point what do you
> actually want to do as there may be other solutions you haven't
> thought
> of that may be better.
>
> For example, I started out using memcached on a project more as a play
> around with it then anything serious and I ended up just using shared
> memory since it's less points of failure and what not.
I might need to know as much as I can. I might write a brief course
that introduces memcache, I might need to teach and advise folks in
the use of memcache. In particular the piece that matters to me is
website performance optimization by using memcache. I assume that
means using memcache to alleviate Database queries by serializing
session and user information into memcache rather than hitting the
Database for it. Most likely I will need to know about memcache and
it's place in high performance web site architectures.
It came up as a topic and subject that is possibly in my future
career path. It looks like something rather basic and
straightforward, (I love that kind of stuff) yet with really cool
implications. So I am taking some free time to explore it.
I am curious about your project and your use of shared mem and what
the weaknesses of memcached. You looked into memcache at the early
phases of a project and were still coding so you were able to utilize
shared mem at that time ? It was simpler to keep everything in one
place , the application? I assume I will be looking at clusters of
machines handling web requests so shared mem on one machine might not
be a solution. Websites tend to scale out onto multiple machines and
most of the tools , apache, mysql, php, allow for that. Memcached
seems to have a place in that environment.
Still i would like to hear what your programming language was and
what your application was and if you did any performance benchmarks
or other tests ?
It seems like much of the "smarts" of using memcached is handled by
the libraries in the applications. I will start with PHP but if Perl
or Ruby or something is better, please let me know.
>
>> I intended to build my box and perhaps rent rackspace from one of
>> the list members, due to a lack of time, just leasing a self
>> managed box made the best short term solution when I faced an
>> emergency with my previous machine.
>
> The other option is a virtual server, I found out about serveraxis
> from
> this list, and while they've put their prices up for new hostings they
> still offer best bang for buck imho, and it's a lot more economical
> then
> having to rent an entire server etc.
I know, for some superstitious reason I so far have stayed away from
virtualized machines. Besides it is too late, I needed to move fast.
I might migrate once I get through this switch, but I have a free
week, and a troubled box, so I made the move. My main goal was speed.
Better options might have been and might still be available, but I
had to get things ready so I can secure and migrate in the next few
days.
Thanks Duane !!
--
Tom
>
> --
>
> Best regards,
> Duane
>
> http://www.freeauth.org - Enterprise Two Factor Authentication
> http://www.nodedb.com - Think globally, network locally
> http://www.sydneywireless.com - Telecommunications Freedom
> http://e164.org - Because e164.arpa is a tax on VoIP
>
> "In the long run the pessimist may be proved right,
> but the optimist has a better time on the trip."
> _______________________________________________
> colug432 mailing list colug432 at colug.net
> http://www.colug.net/mailman/listinfo/colug432
More information about the colug432
mailing list